Skip to main content

Verdell HomeHome & Garden

A conversion problem that looked like a traffic problem

Verdell was buying more traffic every quarter to hold flat revenue. The detail pages, not the campaigns, were the constraint.

Engagement: Listing and creative programme · 9 months

Headline results

  • +41%

    Conversion rate

    Unit session percentage, core SKUs

  • +18%

    Click-through rate

    From search results

  • -9%

    Return rate

    Driven by accurate sizing imagery

Illustrative figures. This case study is demonstration content. Replace the brand, quote and every number here with verified, client-approved data before publishing — see src/content/case-studies.ts.

The challenge

What was actually wrong.

Sessions were up 34% year on year. Revenue was up 4%. Every extra dollar of advertising was buying traffic that did not convert.

The catalogue's photography had been produced for a wholesale line sheet: white background, single angle, no scale reference and no lifestyle context.

Background

Verdell sells mid-priced home textiles where the two dominant purchase objections are dimensions and material feel — neither of which the existing imagery addressed.

Returns data showed 'not as described' and 'wrong size' accounting for a majority of returns, which confirmed the listing rather than the product was the problem.

Strategy

What we decided to do — and in what order.

  1. Start from the returns data

    Return reason codes and review text told us exactly which two objections to answer, so the shot list was written from evidence rather than taste.

  2. Give every image slot a job

    Recognition, scale, material detail, objection, lifestyle, comparison. No slot duplicated another.

  3. Change the main image first

    It carries the most weight and is the cleanest thing to isolate, so it shipped alone with a four-week read window.

  4. Build A+ around comparison

    A size and material comparison chart replaced a brand-story module that restated the bullets.

Execution

The work, week by week.

  • Re-shot main images for 22 core SKUs with a consistent scale reference in frame.
  • Produced a six-slot image system and applied it across the catalogue.
  • Rewrote bullets to lead with the two objections rather than with features.
  • Built comparison-led A+ modules for all variation families.
  • Ran sequential tests with matched four-week windows, controlling for price and stock.

Before vs after

The movement.

Metrics before and after the engagement. All figures are illustrative placeholders.
MetricBeforeAfterNote
Unit session percentage7.8%11.0%Core SKU average
Images per listing47Including one video
Returns: 'wrong size'5.1%2.4%As share of units sold
Ad spendBaselineUnchangedConversion gains came without additional budget
BaselineSequenceVideo
Unit session percentage ×10, by test stage. Illustrative placeholder data.
View the underlying data as a table
Values plotted in the chart above
PeriodIndexed value
Baseline78
Main image89
Sequence98
A+105
Video110

Timeline

How it unfolded.

  1. Weeks 1–3

    Evidence

    Review mining, returns analysis and competitor teardown.

  2. Weeks 4–6

    Production

    Shot list approved, studio and lifestyle production completed.

  3. Weeks 7–18

    Sequential testing

    Main image, then sequence, then A+ — each with a clean read window.

  4. Months 5–9

    Rollout

    Visual system applied across the remaining catalogue.

Key learnings

What we'd tell the next brand.

  • Traffic problems and conversion problems look identical in a revenue chart and need opposite responses.

  • Returns data is the cheapest creative brief available and almost nobody reads it.

  • Sequential testing is slower than shipping everything at once, and it is the only way to know what worked.

We assumed we needed more budget. It turned out we needed different photographs.
[CLIENT NAME], [JOB TITLE], Verdell Home

Placeholder attribution. Client names and quotes are published only with written permission.

Let's build your growth plan.

Every engagement starts the same way: a written audit of advertising, listings, organic position, inventory and account health, with a recommended first ninety days.